The Mistaken Allure of Index Funds
Financial Planning Standards Board. If you are an Indian resident looking for a financial plan prepared according to your needs & goals, write to her at shruti(AT)richesawait.com
Index funds are the norm and the “thing” in the US for quite some time now. They are considered the best and easiest form of investment.
But fortunately or unfortunately India is a different ball game all together. This means that the much loved index funds are not the best investment strategy for Indians, at least for the foreseeable future. Let’s understand why.
What are Index Funds?
Index Funds are a passive form of investing. Index fund’s main objective is to generate return in-line with its benchmark. They are basically a no-brainer fund, as they just mimic the benchmark portfolio.
For example, a fund tracking the Nifty 50 Index will buy the same 50 stocks and in the same proportion as represented in the Nifty Index. Also, in case of any changes like replacement of one stock with another in Nifty 50, the index fund will undergo the same changes.
This is in direct contrast to actively managed funds. In an actively managed fund the main objective is to beat the market or benchmark returns. The fund manager has complete leeway as to how he or she wants to construct their portfolio, in order to generate higher returns.
Allure of Index Funds
The main attraction point of Index Funds in markets like the US are:
- Low cost
As Index funds do not require active research and stock picking, the expense cost of these funds are comparatively lower than that of actively managed funds. - Ready-made diversified portfolio
Since one is mimicking the index itself, one is getting a ready-made easy portfolio without much effort. Also, since the index is a representative of entire market the said portfolio will be well diversified also. - Better Returns
The fund managers of active funds are not able to beat the benchmark consistently in a well-oiled market like the US. Therefore, Index Funds are seen as the perfect solution, since they provide benchmark returns at low cost.
While the above mentioned advantages may hold true in case of developed market like the US, in India this is not the case. Here is why:
- Index in India does not represent market correctly
The main argument held in favour of index funds is that they own all the securities in an index, which is fair and representative sample of the market. But this is not true in case of India.
Sensex may be the barometer of market, but it cannot be considered a guideline for investing. This is because it’s certainly not diversified enough to capture all the sectors. Sectors like textiles, aviation etc. find no place in it.
Similarly in Nifty – shipping, consumer durables, agriculture etc. are missing. Even if the sector is represented in the sensex, the selection of stocks are not usually the best.
For example, PSU Banks is represented by SBI only, but stocks of Syndicate Bank and Vijaya Bank are performing much much better than SBI Bank in terms of returns.
The main reason for this is that Index stocks picked in India have liquidity as a major consideration. Only companies having the highest market capitalization or liquidity find a place in these indices and therefore some great performing and sound companies get left out. A stock may find its way to the Sensex or Nifty, but that doesn’t mean it is the best buy in its field. Smaller companies may provide better investment options. - Active Funds have outperformed Index Funds regularly
Many actively managed diversified funds have beaten the index funds over time in Indian market. This is due to the fact that India is an emerging market, where new companies are still being discovered and are yet to become a part of index. Since we have so much scope of investing outside of indices, investors are able to make more money by investing in actively managed fund. The average rupee invested in an equity mutual fund continues to grow faster than the index fund.Unlike index funds a computer algorithm is not deciding where your money goes in a managed mutual fund but an actual real person called the fund manager is taking those decisions using all his skills, experience, wisdom & research to figure out where to steer the ship.
- Low cost not such a big attraction
After the introduction of direct funds the difference between the cost of index fund and actively managed fund is not that high. Currently, the expense ratio of index fund is less than 1%, as against the regular funds where cost can be above 2% or direct funds where expense ratio is around 1%. Although no doubt, active funds are costlier, but this extra cost gets justified by higher returns. Returns for actively managed funds are already adjusted for the expense ratio, and are still higher than index funds.
Index Funds are not going to gain popularity in India as long as there is a lack of dynamically managed or innovative indices. Till then, actively managed funds will continue to outperform & will be preferred over index funds.
Therefore, don’t just start investing in Index funds in India after reading about them on the internet, and even if you want to invest in them, allocate a small portion of your investment to index funds and invest the rest in a better performing actively managed fund.
After all it’s about earning more returns, right?
Very misleading article. Unfortunately India lacks the low cost index funds like the US or Europe. Low costs are a great advantage over the long term…..and I mean 15 , 20 or 25 years. I wish companies like Vanguard come to India. As the Indian market size grows beating the index will become a challenge for so called active managers.
I guess active funds are better for financial health of mutual fund distributors…….
Firstly, I create financial plans for my clients on a fee-based model. Your sly implication that I get commission on recommending particular funds don’t hold water as I don’t work on a commission model.
Secondly, I am confused as to why you found this post misleading as you are basically saying the same thing? The simple fact is that India lacks the kind of index funds available in the US and as long as this problem persists, actively managed funds are going to outperform index funds.